
Introduction
Attacks of clinical coccidiosis
in cattle are marked by diarrhea, loss of blood,
dehydration and anorexia. Even these signs are not
always dramatically presented. Blood may or may not
be evident in the feces. The disease results in a
decline in general health, a failing appetite and
eventually a loss of condition. The precise
mechanism of development of these signs and the
details and degree of recovery from coccidial
infections are incompletely understood. It is
certain that the physiologic and cellular pathologic
changes which occur in infected animals
significantly affect their ability to throw off the
disease and return to normal. Such changes can also
be expected to affect the ability of the animals
with clinical coccidiosis to resist other diseases.
The altered intestinal function has been shown to
markedly affect nutrient and water intake from the
gut of chickens with coccidiosis which can be
expected to have a similar effect in cattle with
this disease. It is not surprising to note that
blood components such as hemoglobin, serum globulin,
glucose and phosphorus, and other characteristics,
are significantly altered in cattle with
coccidiosis. Although little is known about the
long-term effects of coccidiosis in cattle, loss of
condition, reduced gains and mortality are of vital
importance to dairy and beef producers.
The organisms which cause
coccidiosis are tiny one-celled protozoa, chiefly of
the genus Eimeria. Coccidia are very host
specificthat is, coccidia which affect cattle
do not affect birds, and vice versa. Another way in
which coccidia differ from most other parasites is
that often several species of coccidia occur in a
single species of host. Twenty-one species have been
described as occurring in cattle, 10 in sheep, 10 in
rabbits and nine in poultry.
Although 15 to 21 species of
coccidia have been described as occurring in cattle,
only two species, Eimeria bovis and E.
zurnii, are known regularly to cause coccidiosis
accompanied by bloody diarrhea. Low-level infection
with one or several species of coccidia is present
in 100% of cattle, with no apparent damage to the
host. Examinations for coccidia are made by
collecting fecal samples and mixing with a
concentrated sugar solution to cause the coccidia to
float to the surface where they can be recovered for
microscopic examination. Such an examination will
permit a trained observer to identify the species of
coccidia involved. This, along with other clinical
signs, will enable assessment of the impact of the
infection on the health of the animal.
The Parasites
Coccidia have a complex life
cycle with several stages simultaneously occurring
in separate host cells. Click here
to see an interactive diagrammatic representation of
the life cycle of E. bovis. It should be
noted that the stage found in the feces is the
oocyst. The oocyst, which has a protective wall
resistant to physical, chemical and bacterial
action, is discharged from the animal in the feces.
With favorable environmental conditions of
temperature and moisture, the oocyst goes through a
maturation process called sporulation, which makes
it infective to cattle. When the sporulated oocyst
is ingested by the host, the sporozoites within it
excyst and penetrate cells of the intestinal wall.
They grow and develop into schizonts. Schizonts
undergo a multiple dividing process that results in
the formation of numerous new individuals called
merozoites. After the schizont matures, the
merozoites are released by the rupture of the host
cell and they invade new cells and repeat the
process.
For E. bovis, the
second-generation merozoites enter new host cells
and undergo sexual production, culminating in the
formation of oocysts. All of the life cycle stages
within the host are completed in a minimum of about
18 days with the peak in numbers of oocysts
discharged occurring about 19 to 22 days after
initiation of infection. The sexual stages are more
numerous than the asexual stagesand they do
more damage to their host cells. The signs of
coccidiosis usually occur at the same time oocysts
are passed in the feces.
E. zurnii, another
pathogenic species of cattle coccidia, has been
found to produce schizonts in both the small and
large intestine between two and 19 days after
infection. Sexual stages have also been observed at
both sites. Oocysts may be discharged as early as
Day 19. All of the stages are found in the
epithelial cells.
E. auburnensis is unusual
in that the schizont is deeply imbedded and the
sexual stages characteristically parasitize cells of
mesodermal origin. The microgametocytes are
unusually largeso large that they can be
observed without the aid of a microscope. The stages
of the life cycle within the host are completed in
about 18 days. Like E. bovis, E.
ellipsoidalis develops in the small intestine,
but all the known stages occur in the epithelial
cells lining the crypts. The stages of the life
cycle within the host are relatively short,
requiring only about 10 days. In severe infections,
E. ellipsoidalis can produce a nonbloody
diarrhea which generally lasts only a few days.
E. alabamensis also develops within the
intestine but is distinctive in that the parasites
lie within the nucleus of the host cell. It is not
generally pathogenic, except in unusually heavy
infections.
Distribution of Bovine Coccidia
Bovine coccidiosis occurs within
cattle worldwide and at all times of the year. In
the United States, these representative studies show
how widespread coccidiosis is and how many cattle
are infected in various locations:
Wisconsin
In one study, oocysts of E.
bovis were
found1
in 40.7% of 2,492 fecal samples from cattle of all
ages. They were relatively more numerous in samples
from cattle over four and one-half months old than
in samples from younger calves. Oocysts of E.
zurnii were found in 42.2% of the same fecal
samples as checked for E. bovis.
A second study2
involving a spring survey of dairy cattle between
one week and 18 months of age found coccidia in all
71 counties sampledin fact, only 16.5% of the
individual samples were negative for oocysts.
Iowa
Coccidia were found3
in 86 of 510 fecal specimens of adult cows (16.9%)
and in 27 of 83 specimens from calves (32.6%).
Illinois
Coccidia were found4
in 85% of the fecal specimens from 795 beef calves
from 35 farms. The percentage of cattle coccidia
found were E. bovis, 52%; E. zurnii,
37%; E. auburnensis, 46%; E.
ellipsoidalis, 40%; E. canadensis, 35%;
E. alabamensis, 17%; E. cylindrica,
12%; E. subspherica, 8%; E.
wyomingensis, 6%; E. brasiliensis, 4%;
Isospora spp., 2%; and E.
bukidnonensis, 1%.
Montana
One or more of nine
Eimeria species were identified in 64.9% of the cattle
examined.5
It has been suggested that these numbers will only
increase. While this suggestion is not yet validated
by data, increased concentration of animals can be
expected to favor increased incidence of coccidial
infection.
Losses from Bovine Coccidiosis
Coccidiosis is one of the five
most economically important intestinal diseases in
the cattle industry. Recent estimates place the
annual cost of coccidiosis at one hundred million
dollars. Because of the insidious nature of
coccidiosis, much of the damage from the disease has
already occurred by the time signs and symptoms are
discernible. The expense of animals that die from
coccidiosis, or secondary infections that gain a
foothold because of the disease, can easily be
estimated. However, the major loss from coccidiosis
probably comes as the result of poor rate gains from
subclinically infected animals.
Animals severely affected by
coccidiosis lose weight and do not regain it during
the normal growing period.6
Studies show that “yearling” cattle that had been
severely affected by coccidiosis when two months old
were 95 lbs. (43.2 kg) lighter than uninfected
controls at the end of an 11-month experimental
period. These animals required four to eight weeks
to make up the weight loss as a result of the
infection. Following recovery, the animals gained at
about the same rate as the control group but would
have required an additional 40 days or more of
feeding to attain the same end weight.
The cost of therapy after a
clinical outbreak of cattle coccidiosis occurs is
considerably higher than the cost of early treatment
of infection to prevent the disease.7
At least a portion of this higher cost is a result
of the need for special handling of the animals for
veterinary service and the need for medication for
secondary diseases such as pneumonia. Furthermore,
later treatment may not be as effective, since the
sexual stages of the life cycle of coccidia are
generally not as sensitive to coccidiostats as the
earlier asexual stages. Therefore, a strategic plan
of preventive treatment based on previous history of
the disease in a particular environment, and other
management considerations, could offer the best way
to reduce losses due to cattle coccidiosis.
Development of Immunity
Since most severe cases of
coccidiosis occur in calves, it can be inferred that
some form of immunity is acquired as a result of
exposure to the disease. In fact, a study proved
that cattle infected with E. bovis do develop
resistance to reinfection, persisting from three
months to one year or longer.8
Resistance to reinfection with E. zurnii and
E. ellipsoidalis have also been reported but
not quantitated. By contrast, infections of E.
alabamensis have been shown to elicit little
immunity.
In studies on the nature of
immunity to bovine coccidia, one
report9
indicates that the firstgeneration schizonts and/or
merozoites occurring in the small intestine, as well
as the second-generation schizonts, merozoites and
gametocytes occurring in the large intestine, are
affected by the immune reaction. The effects on the
stages of the life cycle in the large intestine were
observed to be of greater importance than the
effects on the stages in the small intestine. It was
also observed that the immune reaction affects the
numbers but not the timing of the various life cycle
stages. Oocysts of E. bovis retained in the
mucosa for several weeks acted as a continuing
source of antigenic stimulations in immune animals.
This report also found that invasion of the
intestinal mucosa by first-generation merozoites of
E. bovis was inhibited in immune calves.
Although studies10
have been able to demonstrate the presence in calves
of antibodies against E. bovis merozoites and
oocysts two weeks after infection, the importance of
these antibodies has not been clearly established.
The rapid turnover rate of the epithelial cells
lining the intestinal wall and the fact that these
are the host cells for the coccidia suggest that the
source of the refractory activity resides outside
these cells. The exact nature of the resistance to
reinfection remains to be determined.
The Need for Parasite Control
The following are some of the ways
in which coccidia damage their host:
1. By damaging the host’s
intestinal tissues, which results in reduced
absorption capacity.
2. By causing blood and tissue loss
for which there is an obvious cost of replacement.
3. By damaging intestinal
epithelium, and allowing other kinds of pathogenic
organisms and toxins to enter.
4. By inducing immunosuppression,
coccidial infection reduces the ability of the host
animal to resist other infections.
Modern confinement operations
concentrate both the host and parasite populations.
These high-density operations are ideal for survival
and reproduction of coccidia and other parasites,
leading to clinical infections.
As a result of this increased
parasite load, and the economic pressures for feed
efficiency in production animals, producers can no
longer afford to let clinical and subclinical
coccidiosis go uncontrolled.
References
1. Boughton DC. Bovine
coccidiosis: from carrier to clinical case. North
Am Vet 1945:147.
2. Hasche MR, Todd AC.
Prevalence of bovine coccidia in Wisconsin.
JAVMA 1959;May 15:449.
3. Zimmerman WJ,
Hubbard ED. Gastrointestinal parasitism in Iowa
cattle. JAVMA 1961;139:555.
4. Szanto J, Mohan
LVP, Levine ND. Prevalence of coccidia and
gastrointestinal nematodes in beef cattle in Illinois
and their relation to shipping fever. JAVMA
1964;144:741.
5. Jacobson RH, Worley
DE. Incidence and distribution of helminth parasites
and coccidia in Montana cattle. Am J Vet Res
1969;30(7):1113.
6. Fitzgerald PR,
Mansfield ME. Effects of bovine coccidiosis on certain
blood components, feed consumption, and body weight
changes of calves. Am J Vet Res
1972;33(7):1391-1397(Ref3).
7. Fitzgerald PR. The
economics of bovine coccidiosis. Feedstuffs
1972;Sept 4:28.
8. Senger CM, Hammond
DM, Thorne JL, Johnson AE, Wells M. Resistance of
calves to reinfection with Eimeria bovis. J
Protozool 1959;6:51-58.
9. Hammond DM,
Anderson FL, Miner ML. The site of the immune reaction
against Eimeria bovis in calves. J Parasitol
1963;41:414-424.
10. Anderson FL,
Lowder LJ, Hammond DM, Carter PB. Antibody production
in experimental Eimeria bovis infections in calves.
Exper Parasitol 1965;16:23-35.
|